Television in Review

Archive for November 24th, 2008

Hey, how was Twilight?

In Harry Potter, Robert Pattinson, Stephanie Meyer, Twilight on November 24, 2008 at 1:00 pm

I notice that a lot of people around wordpress have been searching for the new movie Twilight. Now, I’ve read Stephanie Meyer’s books, and I’m sure I’ll be seeing the movie. Maybe this weekend or the next (I’ve got family in town for the holidays, so I can’t do it before then). My question to all you readers out there is…

HOW DID YOU LIKE THE MOVIE?

I obviously read the first book, so I know what happens (so spoilers should be ok unless they really changed the story–in which case it’s not really Twilight, huh?). Was it good? Better than the Harry Potter franchise? Is Robert Pattinson as dreamy as the teenage girls think he is? A believable love story? How’re the fight scenes? Were teenage guys really there?

And what I really want to know…

How’s the movie compare to the book?

I’m just curious, so leave comments and treat it like a forum!

I will kick you in the face

In Bones, Eli Stone, Emmy Awards, Friends, Heroes, Oscars, Pushing Daisies, Screen Actors Guild, The Office, Writers Guild of America, Writers' Strike, news on November 24, 2008 at 12:48 pm

I love our actors. I really do. I love the casts of our favorite shows: Bones, The Office, Eli Stone

But, actors, if you strike, I will kick you in your perfectly made up faces.

If you haven’t heard, the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) might be going on strike. It’s true. I read about it here and here. Apparently, like the writers’ strike last year, actors are looking for similar benefits/compensation for their work on the Internet.

Ok, it’s fair. People should be compensated for their work–especially in new mediums. But, actors, if you strike, you’re stupid.

Let’s relay the facts. Last year’s writers’ strike went on a long time. It stopped the shooting of our shows–some of which, didn’t recover (in fact, I think the only one that did was Heroes because it gave the show a chance to stop and restart after its crappy season 2). We’re actually still seeing the fallout of the strike today with low ratings to our favorite shows and cancellations of sophomore favorites like Pushing Daisies.

The writers did eventually get their deal–not an ideal, perfect compromise, but one that they could work with. And in the meantime, I got to go to a pretty cool rally.

(Sorry, off topic there.)

But people were out of work for a long time. Non-union employees really got hurt.

The great part was that the SAG was behind the WGA the entire time. Of course they were! How could they not support their writers? Without the writers, where would they be?

But here’s the issue: An actors’ strike would not be the same. First, they’re looking for even better compensation than the writers for Internet us. In an already terrible economy, I can’t imagine that this is going to work.

Second, I don’t think actors carry as much weight sometimes.

I really hate to say this because I love actors. I really do. But in a time when TV is growing each night by reality television, actors on TV are really getting scarce. Of course, this doesn’t mean that the strike would only affect TV, but it certainly wouldn’t help it. And as much as you all don’t want to believe it, yes, reality TV is scripted–at least to a degree. Which means that writers still needed to be there; actors don’t.

Third, I just don’t think they’ll get the public behind them. Actors have a bad rap. They aren’t all like this, but the sad part is, most of the population sees actors as Brad Pitts and Angelina Jolies. They’re people who are paid tons for the work that they do.

Again, most actors aren’t paid tons, but the fact that people think they are generally makes them less inclined to go with the actors when actors want more money. I feel like they were much more likely to look at the writers–individuals that are only honored at the Oscars and Emmys–but actors are shown all the time.

Plus, my first memory of entertainment strikes is when the cast of Friends left the set because they weren’t getting a million each per episode. A past like this isn’t going to get people happy.

And people LOVE TV and movies! They want to see more, not less. Seeing the actors strike might just get them frustrated.

Last, I think actors might be missing the issue of cancellation. Did we not learn from Pushing Daisies and many other shows on or close to the chopping block? A strike has ramifications, and if you’re going to do it, take into account that your show might not be there when you get back. Which means you won’t be paid at all.

So anyway, actors, please don’t strike. You’ll make me a very unhappy Raked. I really don’t want to kick you in the faces. I just bought new boots.

“Welcome back, Jerky-jerkface.”

In BJ Novak, Steve Carell, TV, The Office on November 24, 2008 at 12:45 pm

Hi all. JC’s here again–this time covering The Office.

THE OFFICE 5.08: “Frame Toby”

In this epsiode, Michael plots to get Toby fired. Sexual harassment doesn’t work, neither does throwing Toby’s Costa Rica photos on the floor and inviting a free punch. So Dwight comes up with a brilliant idea; framing Toby for drug use. Michael tries to buy drugs from Bob Vance’s delivery guys and gets totally ripped off. Dwight tips off the cops, who come to the office, search Toby’s desk and arrest him. Of course, Michael tries to back out of the set-up at the last minute, but by then, things have gone to far. Until the cops reveal that the pot Michael bought, for $500, is a bunch of basil and caprese salad. Ah, Michael. So clueless.

Plot B for this week is a classic work issue that anyone who’s worked in an office has probably encountered. I love the Microwave mess, and the anonymous passive aggressive letter (thanks Pam; sign it next time!) left in the kitchen. That happened in my office a week or two ago. This is why I love The Office. So true!

Plot C for this week revolves around Jim buying his parent’s house. Kind of forgot about that from last week. I’m sure that having a house is nice but um, moving your future bride into your parent’s house is a little weird. Extra weird with the 70s shag carpet and wood paneling. I didn’t think Pam would be super happy about that. At the end of the episode, she said she loved it and she looked happy. But I’m going to guess now that this house is going to be an issue in the future.

Other thoughts: Ryan has become such an incredible douche. After trying to force Pam to clean up the microwave, he laughs off the suggestion that he could clean it himself. “I’d make it worse,” he said. “How would running a paper towel over the microwave make it worse.” says Pam. “I don’t know. I’d find a way!” says Ryan, with a frat-boy laugh.

Overall, a good episode with some solid laughs. Nothing too over the top, but not a lot of plot advancement either. Seems like the writers wanted to settle down into a more ordinary episode of the office, after all the chaos of Pam’s absence.

Oh yeah, and Ryan is going to Thailand with some random people. He tries to break up with Kelly, then asks her to have sex with him one last time and give him any extra money that might be in her wallet. After a long pause, Kelly looks confused and then says, “Alright.” Classic.

Finally, I’ll leave you with some good Michael lines from this week:

“Seems awfully mean, but sometimes the ends justify the mean.”

“I tried. I tried to talk to Toby and be his friend, but that is like trying to be friends with an evil snail. I feel like I’ve died inside. I feel like Neve Campbell in Scream 2. She thinks she can go to college and be happy. And then, the murderer comes back and starts killing off all of her friends. I learned a lot of lessons from that movie. This is one of them.”